fbpx
| Profiles |

Watchtower on the River Tyne

I’m not sure what to expect.

Rabbi Todros Miller is in town, visiting Montreal for a family simchah, and he will be speaking.

As a menahel at the Gateshead Seminary, heir to an approach and vision that shaped generations of European Torah Jewry, a path stretching through towns small in size but immense in impact, Rabbi Miller has a reputation as an orator.

But not just an orator. Be careful, I’m told by those who know him; if you get lost in his rhetoric, you will miss what’s really happening.

Because beneath the grandeur of the presentation, there is the unvarnished truth. Beneath the style lies substance.

I take a seat near the rear of the room in which the menahel will be speaking, readying myself to watch him weave a super-philosophical tapestry of Rambans and Maharals before our eyes, leaving us with mouths agape.

The Rav, as his students refer to him, comes in and begins to speak in his elegant British accent, but the material isn’t theology or philosophy. Instead he says a shiur, a classic yeshivish shtickel Torah.

I find it surprising, but only because I lack context. Later, the Rav will sit with me, speaking about the seminary, about his father, about the ideology behind it — and I will understand. The shiur I hear today isn’t a break with the Rav’s day job — it’s the oxygen that allows him to do his day job.

At a table in the empty beis medrash, Rav Todros articulates the vision of his father, Rabbi Mordechai Miller. Unlike others, who often pause to search for the right word, the Rav seems to know exactly what he wants to say, and is able to locate the precise word to convey his point.

“People say that Sarah Schenirer founded Bais Yaakov,” he tells me. “She certainly did, but she wasn’t the pioneer of chinuch habanos. Before Bais Yaakov existed, Rav Shamshon Raphael Hirsch had a girls’ school, and pre-World War II Telshe had Yavne. What Sarah Schenirer did was create a network, a formal educational system. Within that framework, though, individual schools have their own innovations. To understand the chiddush of Gateshead, you have to know its history.”

Rav Eliyahu Eliezer Dessler’s vision for the young women of Gateshead had a nuance of its own, an ideal slightly different from the one that had guided other Bais Yaakov schools. Gateshead’s Teachers Training College wouldn’t just be an institution designed to keep frum girls connected, but a place where they could absorb a genuine desire for greatness in Torah, to be part of Torah splendor. In 1942, Rav Dessler had established the Gateshead Kollel, where he was cultivating a new generation of talmidei chachamim; he understood that without supportive wives, the soldiers in his army wouldn’t be very effective.

With a roaring fire decimating the Torah world a thousand miles away, Rav Dessler was hard at work rebuilding it.

“It wasn’t just Torah that had been destroyed, but the greatness and glory of Torah as well,” Rav Todros explains. “In order to restore that kavod haTorah, to give Klal Yisrael back its soul, Rav Dessler identified two needs: real talmidei chachamim, and wives who perceived the glory in being married to those scholars.”

Decades later, the father of a Gateshead Seminary student would come visit for Shabbos. The highlight of his stay was being able to participate in the famed Shabbos shiur given by the seminary’s dean — Rav Dessler’s beloved talmid — Rabbi Mordechai Miller.

After the shiur was complete, the gentleman wondered if the girls were really capable of perceiving its depth.

“I’m not here to teach them Torah,” Rabbi Miller replied. “I’m here to teach them kavod haTorah, to invest them with awe and reverence for what Torah is, to expose them to something beyond their own grasp.”

“Torah,” Rabbi Todros Miller explains, “is something above you. If you can totally grasp it, then it’s not above you. Stand back and marvel at what you’re being shown was my father’s approach.”

Rabbi Mordechai Miller knew what his role was — and what it was not. As Rav Dessler’s choice to lead the seminary, he knew how to convey the grandeur of Torah, even as he himself had traveled quite the road to get there.

Born in a small town near London in 1921 to Lithuanian immigrants, young Mordechai Miller seemed destined for professional greatness. He graduated at the top of his class, and then proceeded to law school. His parents anticipated his graduation and the brilliant career that would follow.

Unwittingly, they had planted the seeds of his own eventual rejection of that path. When he was 14, they had arranged for him to join a private Torah-learning group. Meant to provide a bit of authentic Torah learning for these public-school students, the group was led by a refugee from a small town in Lithuania whose name — Rav Eliyahu Eliezer Dessler — meant little to most British Jews.

But in that group, the teens got to taste the nobility, the precision, the call to greatness that was Kelm.

Mordechai Miller slid smoothly into law school and he thrived, just as he always had.

To some, it might seem strange that Rav Dessler didn’t just discourage his beloved talmid from following that career path, didn’t exhort him to return to the beis medrash full time.

Why didn’t he say anything? To ask the question, remarks Rabbi Todros Miller — Rav Mordechai’s son and successor — is to fundamentally misunderstand Kelm, its self-awareness and patience and focus on complete and total honesty.

Rav Dessler trusted his talmid, and he had the discipline to wait for Mordechai Miller to see the truth for himself.

Words were sacred in Kelm. Rav Dessler offered young Mordechai a single comment, in casual conversation. “You will become a lawyer and you’ll likely be very successful financially. At that point, your mission in life will be to support talmidei chachamim. So why be the means to an end when you can be the end, the talmid chacham himself?”

The words sat there, resting, percolating, expanding in the talmid’s heart. Eventually, Mordechai Miller abandoned his legal training for other vistas. As he would frequently quip, “I exchanged the laws of profits, for the laws of the prophets.”

When he was still in college, the talmid started on his academic thesis. He planned to write a piece contrasting the halachic rulings in Choshen Mishpat with the British justice system, comparing how issues were addressed via halachah and in court. It seemed a brilliant concept — and a way of allowing him to remain immersed in learning even as he worked on his thesis.

He sent a letter to Rav Dessler, asking for his opinion. Rav Dessler’s return letter never made its way to its intended recipient, and so young Mordechai never knew that his rebbi felt it wasn’t a wise idea.

The student tackled the subject, eventually presenting an intricate thesis on comparative law called Jewish Law of Sale. The academic committee was amazed by the profundity and scope, but felt that it lacked impartiality. “You clearly feel that halachah is superior to secular law,” the professor told his student. “You need to find cases that show that secular law is also right sometimes.”

The young man explained that he wouldn’t do that — that he didn’t believe that — and so the doctorate never came.

He told his rebbi what happened, and Rav Dessler said, “Yes, this is why I advised you against choosing that topic.”

The talmid, who’d never received his rebbi’s letter, was astonished. “I don’t understand,” he asked in confusion. “If the rebbi didn’t like the idea, why did he help me source the marei mekomos and assist me in understanding so many concepts as I worked on it?”

“Because once I shared my opinion, I had spoken,” Rav Dessler said. “Then it became my job to help you. I had confidence that in time, you would understand it for yourself.”

That’s part one of the story.

Part two is that years later, Rabbi Miller was encouraged to print the unpublished manuscript. He didn’t consider it — because of a sentence uttered by his rebbi many years earlier. He didn’t want people to conclude that one can be an academic scholar and also a marbitz Torah.

It wasn’t about being big, but about doing big things.

In 1946, Mordechai Miller joined the Gateshead Yeshivah, finally able to learn under his rebbi, full-time. Along with the yeshivah, Gateshead was home to a fledgling teachers’ seminary, founded by German refugee Mr. Avrohom Dov Kohn. Rav Dessler was deeply involved in the school. He identified one student, Gittel Bindiger, as a match for his talmid and at the end of 1947, Mordechai and Gittel Miller were married.

Mordechai Miller developed into a promising talmid chacham, and his future ensconced between the walls of the beis medrash seemed as clear as his law career once did.

In the halls of the Gateshead Kollel, Rav Dessler was larger than life. It was difficult to conceive of its growth without him at the helm, yet, in 1947, the mashgiach seemed poised to accept the repeated offer to come serve as mashgiach in Yeshivas Ponevezh, in Bnei Brak.

Listening to Rav Todros Miller recount the dry, biographical details of the past is actually its own chinuch lesson, analyzed and expounded upon.

The current menahel of Gateshead points out that in deciding to accept the new job, Rav Dessler taught an enduring lesson to his young talmidim: Man is on a shlichus, a mission, and he goes where he’s needed. After long, lonely years trying to build Torah in England, Rav Dessler was finally established. At last he could enjoy the nachas of having a dedicated group of young talmidim around him and revel in what Gateshead had become. Instead, he made the decision to go where he could be most effective. His young talmid, Mordechai Miller, took note.

“Rav Dessler made his acceptance of the position in Ponevezh conditional: He insisted that he be allowed to return to Gateshead several times a year to spend time with talmidim there. It tells you about the connection that chaburah had with him.”

At the time, Rav Yechezkel Abramsky, who was then av beis din on the London beis din, took note of young Rabbi Miller, whom he identified as a future star of the British rabbinate. Rabbi Miller had it all — the polish and eloquence, the scholarship and academic pedigree — to be an effective voice for Orthodox Jewry on a national stage.

But Rav Dessler had other ideas for his talmid.

Before he set off to Bnei Brak, Rav Dessler gave Mordechai Miller his marching orders: He was to start teaching young women, joining the seminary administration.

It came as a surprise. Mordechai Miller was the star, on a one-way track to being a rosh yeshivah or prominent rav. Instead, he was being tapped to give classes in Mr. Kohn’s living room to a group of students composed primarily of girls who worked by day, wearily joining the evening classes in order to breathe a bit of Jewish air as well.

But young Rabbi Miller had spent most of his adult life under the tutelage of Rav Dessler, and he saw the glory where the world did not. He saw the glory specifically because the world did not. After all, Kelm was never about mass-production, but about building people.

Mordechai Miller stepped forward, ready to meet the challenge.

As they built the seminary, the young Rabbi Miller, along with Mr. Kohn and Rabbi Dov Sternbuch, weren’t replicating some previous model. Instead, a new product was being crafted, a brand of chinuch that was about more than information. It would welcome students into a sublime world, a secret world, one they couldn’t touch outside on the streets of Europe.

It was the exalted world of Torah, and they would learn just how necessary they were to ensure that the holiest song in the world would continue to resonate.

Young Rabbi Miller carried the spirit of the yeshivah, continuing to spend several hours in the beis medrash and delivering private hashkafah vaadim to bochurim, then reflecting that light in the humble seminary quarters. He raised funds and recruited students and persuaded parents — just as his rebbi, Rav Dessler, had done.

Rav Todros continues the story. “Rav Dessler once told my father, ‘Mordechai, you stopped a boy from going to yeshivah.’ ”

It was Kelm speak. Rav Dessler was referring to a situation in which he’d discouraged a young man from attending university while the boy’s father argued, insisting that it was only temporary, and the boy would eventually return to yeshivah. Rav Dessler countered that things don’t work that way: If the boy left yeshivah, he wouldn’t come back.

“But look, Mordechai Miller graduated university and went back,” the father argued, “so you see that it can be done.”

Rav Dessler had no good answer, and he shared this exchange with Rabbi Miller.

“Now,” Rav Todros leans forward, “why do you think Rav Dessler told my father the story? My father hadn’t done anything wrong, so why make him feel guilty? The answer is that Rav Dessler was saying a vort: Every single action has potential to bring kavod Shamayim or the opposite; whatever a Yid does has an impact. He wanted him to remember it going forward.”

Rabbi Miller remembered it.

“It’s amazing to me, he turned his back on two promising career paths, as a lawyer and, l’havdil, as a formal marbitz Torah in the beis medrash, because his rebbi had identified his calling. It wasn’t about how my father could become big but how he could do big things.”

The focus would be on seeing a bigger picture and not getting locked into the moment. Rabbi Miller would learn from his rebbi that Torah is built with patience and serenity, careful thought, and a total lack of ego.

Gateshead’s spiritual contours were shaped around Rav Dessler’s vision: a generation of bnei Torah marrying seminary graduates and settling in the town on the southern bank of the River Tyne. In its streets, a new sound was heard — men arguing in learning, wives discussing what time seder would start or end.

“And my father, by far the most educated man in town,” Rav Todros speak with a sense of wonder, “only grew more humble. He felt no superiority to the bnei Torah because he had a law degree, but the opposite. He soaked in the atmosphere, he reveled in it. It had become a makom Torah.”

There was little by way of precedent when it came to curriculum for a teachers’ seminary and Rabbi Miller, along with Rav Dov Sternbuch and Mr. Kohn, created the educational framework.

“My father was the innovator of formal hashkafah classes. He developed a complete method to explain the complex issues of Yahadus, such as yediah versus bechirah, for example. It wasn’t a topic covered by the prewar seforim, neither chassidus nor mussar. He perceived the needs of this new generation and stood ready, qualified and able to deliver a presentation that wasn’t just a shmuess, but a complete system of thought.”

Astute mechanchim, Rav Todros points out, must seek out the meeting point between eternal mesorah and changing times. “The yesodos and truths are timeless, but the mechanech has to be able to gauge the dor, to know what and how to transmit it.”

Rav Todros discovered this in personal conversation with Rav Yisroel Elya Weintraub, one of the great gaonim of Bnei Brak, a master of the revealed and hidden Torah. They were discussing how, historically, Tanach was seen as the “property” of students of Haskalah, and thus, it wasn’t formally studied in yeshivos. During that destructive movement, the roshei yeshivah felt that a superficial learning of Tanach could lead to mistaken attitudes and perceptions, and so it was best not to learn it at all, rather than to just see the outer core.

“Today things are different,” Rav Yisroel Elya told Rav Todros. “Since Reb Tzaddok (HaKohein of Lublin) wrote his seforim, everything is accessible.”

In his systematic way, where each “maaseh rav” fits neatly into place, Rabbi Miller bookends that story with another encounter with Rav Yisroel Elya. Rav Todros once asked him about pshat in the famous battle between the two women who came before Shlomo Hamelech arguing over who was the rightful mother of a new baby, a cryptic parshah that conceals the deepest mysteries.

Rav Yisroel Elya looked at his visitor and said, “This shelf is too high for you right now.”

Chinuch is about truth — but also knowing when and how to apply that truth.

In time, Rabbi Mordechai Miller and his shiurim would become the prototype, the guiding light, for the seminaries that opened across Europe, Eretz Yisrael, and North America modeled after Gateshead. Rav Shlomo Wolbe sent a shaliach to study at the Gateshead Seminary with the hope of recreating a similar institution in Eretz Yisrael.

“So much so, that my father became a victim of his own success,” says Rav Todros with a soft smile. “My father invested his heart and soul in getting the talmidos to realize the joy in marrying a ben Torah, in living lives elevated by and dedicated to a husband and his Torah. He would say, ‘I don’t want girls to sacrifice to marry a ben Torah. I don’t want a girl to say I need nothing, so I’ll marry a ben Torah. I want a girl to say, I want to have it all, so I’ll marry a ben Torah. It’s the richest, most satisfying life.’ ”

He shares another of Rabbi Miller’s memorable quotes: “Don’t marry a ben Torah because you’re frum; marry a ben Torah because you’re clever.”

“But over time, instead of being a noble choice, it became ‘the thing to do.’ And my father bemoaned anything done without thought. He was a talmid of Rav Dessler, and careful contemplation and depth was the flavor of every mitzvah, of life. This had become trendy.”

In a certain sense, Rav Todros reflects, that shift mirrors a general challenge. “My father was teaching a generation of girls who were drawn by academia and sophistication, but today, our enemy is superficiality. These days, I try to tailor a message that will help our graduates succeed in this battle, in finding growth and authenticity in a shallow world. Today’s goal is to take the ideals and invest them with idealism once again.”

If there’s a mission statement, it’s this. “I never use the word ‘kollel yungerman,’ which is just a label, it’s external. I say ‘ben aliyah,’ encouraging our graduates to lead lives where nothing is more important than their husbands’ Torah. It’s not about how many years he’s in kollel but about what is at the center of his life, of their lives. If a wife sees the hour a day in which he learns as the most vital part of the day, then she won’t ask him to come to a restaurant then, she won’t touch it. If he loves that hour, she will too, and she’ll think about it and eventually, she’ll ask him why he only learns for an hour: Why not two hours?”

The mark of Kelm was imprinted on the seminary in other ways as well. The senior Rabbi Miller once received an angry letter, filled with insults, from a gentleman whose granddaughter had been rejected by the Gateshead Teachers Training College. Even though the applicant had clearly not been a good fit for the school, Rabbi Miller felt badly and asked the Gateshead Rav, Rav Betzalel Rakov, if he should ask mechilah from the offended family. The rav said that there was no reason to apologize: He’d done the right thing.

Nevertheless, Rabbi Miller kept the letter in his desk drawer and would read it before replying to applicants because he wanted the reminder of how much hurt rejection can cause.

The precision of his decision reflected Kelm as well. Every step was thought out. Once a girl from a wealthy home applied, but it was past the application deadline and Rabbi Miller was forced to reject her. Her father called Rabbi Miller and informed him that it would be “worth it” for the seminary to accept the girl. His implicit offer was ignored and Rabbi Miller stood firm.

The father made the trip to Gateshead. Used to getting his way, he came to personally persuade Rabbi Miller that the seminary would benefit greatly from having him as a friend. “Please,” he begged, “accept my daughter and I’ll be generous with you.”

Rabbi Miller was polite. He appreciated the kind offer, but it was too late to accept new students.

Then, Rabbi Miller went to his office and instructed his secretary to put the girl at the head of the waiting list and to give her priority in case someone else would cancel. But if the father would reply to the acceptance by sending a check, the secretary was to send it right back.

“I’m not impressed by the man’s bribe attempt,” he explained, “but I am impressed by his ratzon, his desire to get his daughter into seminary. To take money to accept her is anti-educational, but to honor the true determination of these parents is very much in place.”

That clear, orderly thought extended beyond administration and into the classroom. “My father learned patience from Rav Dessler,” Rav Todros says. “In Kelm, there was no such thing as instant gratification. Everything is a process.”

Even as the seminary continues to welcome, build, teach, and inspire, it serves as a beacon as well, the village watchtower by which others set their clocks.

Rav Dessler had tapped his talmid to educate, but also given him a mission: Rabbi Mordechai Miller was to create a framework that would stand the test of time, that would adapt to the inevitable shifts in society, in approach and attitude.

And so it does, a river that has spawned other streams as well. Follow the clear waters back to their source and you’ll find yourself standing at the southern bank of the River Tyne.

(Originally featured in Mishpacha, Issue 730)

Oops! We could not locate your form.