Both Hashem and the parent share the same goal — that the child return to a vibrant and close relationship with Hashem

A few months ago Rabbi Shneur Aisenstark one of the most veteran and respected educators in North America(as well as someone from whom I have gained much) published a Guestlines piece entitled “Unconditional Love Has Its Limits ” which predictably generated a good deal of buzz. I return to that piece now in light of a pamphlet on the subject of parenting disenchanted teenagers by Rabbi Uri Zohar Israel’s most famous baal teshuvah and a highly respected talmid chacham.

Rabbi Aisenstark’s goal in writing seems to have been to empower parents to actually parent — to offer guidance and set limits — in an era in which many are so terrified of losing their children that they make that result more likely by giving in to every demand and succumbing to every pouty look. The Mishpacha cover highlighting Rabbi Aisenstark’s piece read: “Do We Love Our Children More than We Love Hashem?” That eye-catching blurb was presumably based on the well-known story — cited by Rabbi Aisenstark — of the father of Rabbis Shimon Mordechai and Moshe Schwab who banged his hand down at the Seder table at mention of the Evil Son and proclaimed “I love all of my children very much. You must all know however that I love Hashem much more.” He made clear that any son who became a rasha would be no longer be welcome in the family home.

The question as posed by the Mishpacha cover however presents a false dichotomy. Rarely is the choice for a parent between one’s struggling child and Hashem. Both Hashem and the parent share the same goal — that the child return to a vibrant and close relationship with Hashem. The only question is what course of parental action offers the greatest likelihood of achieving that goal.

To present the choice as one between a struggling child and Hashem is not only wrong it is dangerous. For the parent may decide that showing his love and fealty to Hashem requires him to constantly point out to his child every way in which he falls short in his mitzvah observance — not to mention of familial expectations of dress and external appearance.

Parents may also feel that they are being judged harshly by their neighbors for their wayward child and that they therefore must demonstrate their public disapproval of his dress and comportment at every possible opportunity. (Incidentally I have discovered over the years that passing unfavorable judgments on others’ childrearing — about which one usually knows little other than the ostensible results — is the surest guarantee that one will experience difficulties of a similar nature with one’s own children in short order.)

Maximizing familial tension and confrontation is unlikely to be the way to help a child find his way back. We all instinctively understand this. When we see a neighbor’s child who is struggling most of us recognize that the best thing we can do is to greet him or her with a smile and try to reduce his or her feelings of rejection by the community.

Parents however find it harder to this with their own children because they may feel they are being judged unfavorably by the community due to their child’s appearance or behavior. That is why the warm embrace of a non-family member is so often the key to a child’s return to a life of full observance. The Gemara Bava Metzia 85a relates how Rebbi brought back the wayward grandsons of Rabi Shimon Bar Yochai and Rabi Tarfon by treating them with respect and honor.

In general Rabbi Zohar offers two pieces of advice for parents. The first is: just wait. Most often the central problem with which our children are struggling is the gap between their physical maturation with all the attendant material and physical desires and their much slower emotional maturation. The weaker a teenager’s inner being and lesser developed sense of self the greater importance he will attach to externals such as dress or haircut.

Unfortunately there is no way for parents to speed up emotional maturation. Certainly external pressure will not do it.

In the meantime parents should try to remove themselves from the equation and not interpret every failure of their child to live up to their expectations and dreams as a rebellion or rejection of us or of Hashem. (Not infrequently our own excessive hopes and expectations for our children are a source of their difficulties. How many fathers have damaged their sons by forcing them into “name” yeshivos for the father’s prestige even if the son was not well-suited for that yeshiva?) In most cases our child’s failures are not rejection but merely a reflection of his inability to yet gain control of his actions and desires.

One famous rosh yeshivah whose teenage son sported a bushy head of hair and was often seen around town in shorts made a point of always calling his son over to him whenever he saw him on the street and demonstrated no embarrassment over his appearance. That son is today a major figure in the Torah world.

Each of us prays that Hashem will show patience with us. We all have issues and aspects of our character or behavior that we know require improvement. Yet we remain hopeful that Hashem will give us the chance to make the necessary changes even if they take a long time. Why should we show less patience with our children than we beseech Hashem to show us?

Hashem’s patience is often rewarded. For 40 years Rabi Akiva despised every talmid chacham he saw and felt the desire to bite him as a donkey. Yet one day he was born anew and in time became the greatest explicator of the Oral Law. And so too will our patience as parents usually be rewarded sometimes to a remarkable extent. How many times have you heard someone remark: The child who caused me the greatest grief is now my greatest source of nachas?

Waiting for one’s child to mature is not a purely passive process. During that waiting period the key is to keep the lines of communication open. That means showing an interest in his thoughts and feelings and waiting for those moments where one can gain access to his heart.

That is much easier if those lines of communication were established in earlier years before the troubles developed. Rabbi Zohar recommends setting aside time when children are young to speak to them daily about what concerns them or is currently on their minds — time that is not for learning or testing them on what they have learned.

Above all minimize confrontation. To the extent that parents don’t make an issue of a particular item of clothing or haircut the child will feel less need to hold onto that item of dress. I once heard of a wise father yet inPoland whose son began wearing a type of collar worn by those seeking the “modern world.” On a business trip the father purchased ten such collars for his son and thereby succeeded in completely removing the latter’s temptation to wear one.

Our children writes Rabbi Zohar are going through the same trial that any baal teshuvah does — the effort to forego experiences and pleasures on behalf of kedushah. Pointing out to them their inability to properly observe mitzvos will only force them to deny that they are incapable and cause them to assert that their failures are worked-out choices. At that point their religious failures become an “inyan” for them.

Finally we need not fear that by turning a blind eye to our children’s failures that we are betraying Hashem or that our children will understand us as condoning their behavior. We are doing nothing less than what Moshe Rabbeinu did when he broke the first Luchos and thereby chose to relate to Klal Yisrael at a level of kedushah they were capable of absorbing.

The Maharal (Tiferes Yisrael 35) points out that only the second Luchos are referred to as “good” for only they were appropriate to the nation. The first Luchos were too high for the spiritual level of the Bnei Yisrael at that moment and thus incapable of being absorbed by them. Moshe Rabbeinu could have held onto the first Luchos and lost the nation or broken the Luchos in order to save the nation.

He chose the latter and received the Divine approbation for his decision. We should do no less for our children’s sake — and Hashem’s.

A Narrow Victory and a Warning

Rabbi David Lau won a narrow victory in the race for Ashkenazi chief rabbi capturing only a plurality of the votes. Had Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro rosh yeshivah of Yeshivat Mercaz HaRav not run and split the national religious vote it is possible that Rabbi David Stav would have been victorious.

One might even speculate that Rabbi Shapiro’s goal in standing for the position was primarily to thwart Rabbi Stav’s candidacy. Many prominent voices within the national religious rabbinate considered Rabbi Stav far too inclined to accommodate the halachah to popular practice.

The narrowness of Rabbi Lau’s victory despite his own personal attractiveness as both the son of a popular past chief rabbi and as the well-respected rav of the largely secular city ofModiin should serve to put the Torah world on notice that it cannot take the chief rabbinate for granted.

Rabbi Stav’s candidacy drew so much publicity and support in large part because the chief rabbinate is widely perceived as having become a fiefdom for the distribution of patronage positions. Let us hope that Rabbi Lau succeeds in instilling each employee of the chief rabbinate from the top to the bottom with the attitude that his task is to provide religious services to the broader public in as pleasant manner as possible in order to glorify and spread Torah.

(Originally featured in Mishpacha, Issue 471)